Enhanced due diligence is required when a customer or transaction presents higher risk than standard checks can address.
Common triggers include politically exposed persons, customers in high-risk jurisdictions, correspondent banking relationships, complex ownership structures, and unusual or high-value transactions.
Regulators expect a risk-based approach, so the trigger is the level of assessed risk rather than a fixed list.
What triggers enhanced due diligence?
EDD applies in situations that carry elevated financial-crime risk. The most common triggers are:
- Politically exposed persons (PEPs) — individuals in prominent public positions and their close associates — carry a higher corruption risk.
- High-risk jurisdictions — customers or transactions connected to countries with weak anti-money-laundering controls or subject to heightened monitoring.
- Correspondent banking — relationships where one bank provides services to another, which can obscure the ultimate parties.
- Complex or opaque ownership — structures that make it hard to identify who ultimately owns or controls a customer.
- Unusual transactions — activity that is high-value, unusually structured, or inconsistent with what’s known about the customer.
Is enhanced due diligence a legal requirement?
For the triggers above, EDD is effectively required under a risk-based approach.
Rather than naming a fixed list of customers, regulations require firms to apply deeper checks wherever risk is higher. The FATF’s Recommendation 10 sets the international standard for customer due diligence and enhanced measures.
In the UK, the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 (Regulation 33) specify the situations in which EDD must be applied.
Equivalent obligations exist under the EU’s Anti-Money Laundering Directives and US requirements. The common principle is that higher risk demands enhanced scrutiny.
Which customers require enhanced due diligence?
There is no single fixed list because the requirement is risk-based.
But in practice, customers who commonly trigger EDD include politically exposed persons and their associates, customers based in or connected to high-risk countries, businesses with complex or cross-border ownership, and any customer whose activity or profile raises risk indicators during onboarding or monitoring.
The determination is a judgment your firm has to make and be able to defend.
How does ongoing monitoring trigger EDD?
EDD isn’t only decided at onboarding.
A customer who started as standard risk can move into EDD when something changes: they become a PEP, they begin transacting with a high-risk jurisdiction, or adverse media surfaces about them.
This is where continuous monitoring matters. If your screening surfaces a corruption case or regulatory action involving an existing customer, that’s often the trigger to escalate to enhanced due diligence, and catching it depends on the breadth and speed of the news data behind your monitoring.
What does EDD require you to do?
Once triggered, EDD requires deeper measures: verifying the sources of funds and wealth, mapping beneficial ownership, conducting closer adverse media screening, and applying enhanced ongoing monitoring.
(For what EDD involves in full, see our guide on what enhanced due diligence is.)
Opoint provides the news data that powers the adverse media layer of enhanced due diligence across 135 languages and 250,000 sources, so risks that would trigger EDD surface early. See how Opoint’s data powers enhanced due diligence →
Trusted by
FAQ
When is enhanced due diligence typically required?
EDD is typically required for politically exposed persons, customers in high-risk jurisdictions, correspondent banking relationships, complex ownership structures, and unusual or high-value transactions.
A risk-based approach applies whenever the assessed risk exceeds what standard checks can address.
Which jurisdictions require enhanced due diligence?
EDD is expected under AML frameworks worldwide, including the FATF standards, the UK Money Laundering Regulations 2017, the EU Anti-Money Laundering Directives, and US requirements. It's also triggered by a customer's connection to high-risk countries identified by bodies like the FATF.
Does a change in customer behaviour trigger EDD?
Yes.
A customer can move into enhanced due diligence during the relationship, not just at onboarding, if they become a PEP, start transacting with high-risk jurisdictions, or if adverse media surfaces about them. Ongoing monitoring is what catches these changes.
